Representative Recent Personal Injury Settlements/Verdicts
The following are actual cases from clients of the Roncone Law Offices, P.C. It is important to note that every case is different. The following is intended for informational purposes only. Results are not guaranteed.
While we cannot promise results, but you can count on Roncone Law Offices, P.C. for great service. We care about what has happened to our clients and we are skilled at fighting for them. Find out what we can do for you.
Call us toll free at (978) 534-2444 or send an email via our online contact form. Appointments are available now to discuss your case.
- Pedestrian Struck By Vehicle In Supermarket Parking Lot
- Pedestrian Automobile Accident — Distracted Driver
- Dog Attack
- Mother and Unborn Child versus Motor Vehicle Accident
- Passenger vs. Driver Who Caused Whiplash Injuries
- Struck By Vehicle That Crossed Highway, Vehicle Forced Off Roadway
- High Impact Rear-End Collision on Highway
- Rear-End Collision With Air Bag Deployment
- Struck From Behind While Stopped At A Red Light
- Struck From Behind
- Rear-End Collision —- Back Injury
- Struck From Behind
- “Sideswiped” on Highway, Hit Guardrail
- Side-Swiped While Stopped
- Passenger Injured in Car Accident — Multiple Vehicle Collision
- Vehicle Passenger Injured by Low Impact Collision
- “T-Boned” By Vehicle That Failed To Stop At Stop Sign
- Head On Collision
- Highway Collision — Auto vs. Parked Car
- Driver Ran Stop Sign, Hit Motorcyclist
- Filled RX With Wrong Strength Tablet/Labeled Incorrectly
- Issued Wrong Strength Opiate (Fentanyl), Overdosed
- Chain Fills Wrong Prescription
- Supermarket Negligence — Broken Glass
- Supermarket — Wet Floor
- Stairway — Noncompliance with State Building Code
- Horseplay — Injuries to Minor Child
- Snow and Ice on Parking Lot
Pedestrian Struck By Vehicle In Supermarket Parking Lot
Facts: Client was pushing shopping cart in supermarket parking lot when vehicle struck her while backing out of parking space.
Case name: Pedestrian versus vehicle operator
Injuries alleged: Fractured right hip, multiple abrasions, contusions
Special damages: Medical co-payments, health insurance lien obligations
Amount of settlement: $100,000 (full policy limits — based of comparative negligence)
Our client was in the parking lot of a large chain supermarket returning her shopping cart to its carousel when she was struck by a vehicle that was backing out of a parking space. She suffered a fracture to her hip that required surgical repair with hardware implantation. She remained in the hospital for five days followed by four months therapy. Our client had a significant history of physical and mental health problems that interfered with her functional abilities mentally and physically. The defendant alleged that she was not paying attention and walked into the vehicle causing the incident’s injury.
Our client could not dispute the allegation as she had no memory of the incident and there were no witnesses. The insurance company determined she was comparatively negligent and initially offered 50% of the policy limit. Her family declined litigation due to her mental health issues and her lack of memory. We evidenced the fact that the claim’s value exceeded the policy limits and we were successful in settling this claim out of court for the full policy limits of $100,000.00.
Pedestrian Automobile Accident — Distracted Driver
Facts: A woman was struck while in a marked crosswalk attempting to cross the street.
Case name: Pedestrian versus automobile operator
Multiple fractures to the right leg or tibia; comminuted fractures involving the fibular head and fibular neck with impaction and displacement; right sacral and coccygeal fractures; multiple contusions, abrasions and soft tissue injuries.
Special damages: $35,800 (medical); $1,872 (lost wages)
Amount of settlement: $100,000 (policy limits)
Our client, a 28-year-old pedestrian, was struck by a car as she was attempting to cross the street in Leominster, Worcester County, Massachusetts. The operator of the car (through investigation) admitted to driving while distracted and not paying attention to the road. Our client was brought by ambulance to the emergency room with multiple injuries, including fracture(s) of the tibia and leg, neck injuries, hip injuries and soft tissue injuries. She was an inpatient at the hospital for three days. She was discharged with a leg brace and cautioned against weight bearing on her injured leg. She returned to the hospital for pain management, injections and therapy. She continued treatment on her right knee injury. Over time, she graduated from brace to crutches. After several months of rehabilitation physical therapy, she was again able to walk normally.
The plaintiff was a worker at a large manufacturer of electronic equipment. She missed 18 days of work due to her auto accident-related injury.
The case settled directly with the insurer for the policy limits ($100,000) of the insured motor vehicle operator who struck our client.
Wrongful Death — Mother And Unborn Child Versus Motor Vehicle Accident — Settled For The Full Insurance Policy Limits
Our client, a 22-year-old pregnant woman, was a passenger in a motor vehicle that was traveling on a rainy evening. Their vehicle was struck head on by the operator of a van. The impact of the accident was so serious that the young mother and her unborn child were killed instantly. Our clients were the estates of the young mother and her unborn child. Monetary settlement was negotiated out of court and the full policy limits were obtained for both estates.
Passenger versus Driver Who Caused Whiplash Injuries
Facts: Our client was a front seated passenger in a vehicle being operated by a friend who rear-ended another vehicle causing our client’s injuries.
Case name: Passenger versus driver of vehicle
Injuries alleged: Minor head injury with headache, whiplash injury
Special damages: Lost wages
Amount of settlement: $25,000 (Policy Limits)
Our client was a front seated and belted passenger in a vehicle that rear-ended a vehicle in front of them. The driver of our client’s vehicle was the liable party. Our client reportedly was thrust back and forth striking the side of her head on the dashboard. A few days later she came under the care of her primary physician for neck pain, headaches and visual disturbances. She was referred to an ophthalmologist who diagnosed cataracts unrelated to the accident. Her neck x-rays were negative as was an MRI of her brain. She was diagnosed with a migraine type headache due to a right sided head injury and a whiplash injury (neck strain). She had five physical therapy visits for her neck and her migraine headaches were treated chemically. All symptoms resolved after settlement of her claim. This claim settled out of court. The value of the claim was based on the extent of her pain and suffering and lost wages.
Struck By Vehicle That Crossed Highway — Vehicle Forced Off Roadway
Facts: A passenger was injured when car was struck and forced off the pavement by oncoming vehicle.
Case name: Passenger versus automobile operator
Injuries alleged: Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) with cognitive impairment, whiplash injury, post-concussive syndrome, lumbar strain and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Special damages: (medical expenses and lost wages)
Amount of settlement: $100,000 (full policy limits)
Our client was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling on Route 140 in Gardner, Massachusetts, when her vehicle was struck by an oncoming vehicle forcing it off the road onto the rough shoulder. The impact was minor but her body was thrust back and forth as the driver tried to bring the car to a stop. The defendant was cited for “inattention.”
Plaintiff presented in the emergency room the following day with complaints of head, neck and back pain. She had symptoms of pain radiating to her arms. MRI, CT scan and X-rays were negative. The symptoms progressed to include loss of balance, memory loss and mood changes. Neuropsychological testing confirmed cognitive deficits. She received a total of eight months formal therapy for her sprains and strains, four steroid injections for her neck, cognitive therapy for her head injury, and psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress syndrome. She was out of work for about eight months and ultimately returned to her job.
The case settled out of court for the insured’s policy limits.
High Impact Rear-End Collision On Highway
Facts: Driver struck from behind while stopped in traffic.
Injuries alleged: Neck/cervical Strain, full rotator cuff tear right shoulder (nondependent arm)
Special damages: (medical expenses and lost wages)
Amount of settlement: $100,000 (full policy limits)
Our client was traveling on Route 2 in Harvard, Massachusetts, when she stopped in traffic and was rear-ended. The defendant was cited for following too closely.
Plaintiff saw her primary care physician four days after the accident with complaints of neck, right shoulder and arm pain with tingling/numbness in her right hand. She was initially diagnosed with cervical strain and referred to physical therapy. Her neck symptoms improved but pain in her right shoulder worsened. She was then referred to an orthopedic surgeon (four months post accident). An MRI of her shoulder was inconclusive and she continued with therapy. Shoulder symptoms persisted and she was administered two trigger-point injections without resolve. In March, an arthrogram (MRA) confirmed a full thickness rotator cuff tear of her right shoulder, and she underwent arthroscopic surgery followed by several more months of therapy and lost wages.
The client ultimately developed scar tissue following surgery which extended her recovery time. Consideration was given to the fact that she is at greater risk for future development of degeneration due to the trauma. The case settled out of court for the insured’s policy limits, due in part to the medical records that well documented the severity of the injury and the extensive loss of income.
Rear-End Collision With Air Bag Deployment
Facts: Client stopped in traffic jam on highway when rear-ended
Case name: Client versus negligent driver
Injuries alleged: Back and neck pain radiating to both shoulders and upper extremities
Special damages: Medical expenses of $28,000, No out-of-pocket expenses, client retired, no lost wages.
Amount of settlement: $65,000
Our client was stopped in traffic on a major highway when he was rear-ended. The impact was significant with serious damage to his vehicle and multiple injuries to our client. He took himself to the emergency room for evaluation where he was diagnosed with multiple strains of his neck, thoracic area, lower back and bilateral shoulders. His neck and back pain resolved, but his left shoulder pain persisted. He came under the care of an orthopedic specialist who ordered an MRI of his shoulder that confirmed pre-existing degenerative changes as well as a labrum tear of his shoulder. He underwent a course of physical therapy and two steroid injections with little resolve. He then underwent arthroscopic surgery followed by a 6-month course of therapy. He reportedly made a complete recovery. The pre-existing degenerative condition of his shoulder was considered in evaluating this claim. The case settled out of court.
Facts: A woman was injured when the car she was driving was struck from behind while she was stopped at a red light.
Case name: Client versus automobile operator
Injuries alleged: Neck injury, shoulder injury, hip injury, knee injury, cervical disk injury, cervical radiculitis and hand numbness.
Special damages: $12,700 (medical bills); no lost wages as client was a homemaker.
Amount of settlement: (policy limits)
Our client, a mother of two young children, was rear-ended while stopped at red light in Charlton, Worcester County, Massachusetts. The defendant operator was cited by the investigating officer. Liability was not an issue. Our client was not taken to the hospital by ambulance and did not see a doctor until approximately one month after the accident. The client had an MRI that revealed slight disk bulge and mild straightening of the cervical spine (indicating spasm). She was prescribed an anti-inflammatory medication. She treated with a neurosurgeon who ordered an EMG with negative findings. She opted for physical therapy over epidural injections for pain relief. She continued therapy for several months until terminating therapy on her own. The insurer took issue with the client’s delay of treatment. The medical evidence related all injuries and treatment to the accident.
The client had difficulty caring for her two young children during her recovery period. She continued to perform home exercises. The case eventually settled for the policy limits of the insured due, in part, to the medical evidence indicating the severity of the injury and the likely degenerative affect of the trauma on our client’s spine, which arguably, left her more susceptible to further difficulties in the future.
Rear-End Collision — Back Injury
Case name: Plaintiff versus defendant operator
Injuries alleged: Lower back strain, nerve root impingement of spine
Special damages: $27,306 (medical expenses); $26,086(lost wages)
Amount of settlement: $553,326
The plaintiff — then a 26-year-old married mother of two minor children — was rear-ended in her vehicle by the defendant’s vehicle while stopped at an intersection in Lancaster. The defendant was driving a truck in the course of his employment for defendant employer. The plaintiff was transported via ambulance to the emergency room.
Initially, treatment focused on a lower back strain. The plaintiff was referred to her first course of physical therapy. An MRI revealed disk bulging at L4-5 and L3-4. The plaintiff was treated by an orthopedic surgeon who recommended microsurgery/disentomb on L4-5. Surgery was performed. The postoperative recovery was allegedly not good. The plaintiff developed concentrated and consistent pain in the lower back and into her buttock and right leg. The plaintiff underwent a second series of physical therapy and received corticosteroid injections. A second MRI revealed postoperative enhancing reactive tissue (scar tissue) at the laminectomy site.
The plaintiff underwent a third course of physical therapy and was treated by physiatrists over the next two years. She did not respond well to therapeutic modalities, including ongoing steroid nerve root injections and physical therapy. She reportedly developed pain while sitting, standing and walking.
The plaintiff’s expert opined a 10 percent whole person impairment and a casual relationship to the motor vehicle accident. The defendant’s experts opined a partial disability with restrictions.
The plaintiff reportedly had an episode where she fell at her home. An MRI revealed an additional disk bulge at L5-51. The defendant opined this as a new injury and the plaintiff argued her weakened condition contributed to her fall. The plaintiff continued to treat with prescribed narcotics to address her constant pain.
At the time of the motor vehicle accident, the plaintiff worked as a medical records clerk for an HMO. Immediately following the motor vehicle accident, she was out of work for six months. She attempted to return to work and reduced her hours over the next two to three years but was never able to tolerate full-time employment. Upon the advice of her treating physician, she went out of work permanently.
The case was mediated two weeks prior to trial and settled once week later. A portion of the settlement proceeds was placed in an annuity for the minor children’s college fund.
Rear-End Collision — Struck From Behind While Stopped At A Red Light — Settled For The Full Insurance Policy Limits
A young woman was driving her vehicle and stopped at a red light. Before the light turned green, she was struck from behind (rear-ended) by another driver. She sustained a neck injury or a cervical strain and a hip injury or strain (soft tissue). An MRI revealed she had bulging disks (in her neck or cervical area) at two locations. Her physician did not feel that the disk problems were causing her pain. She treated with physical therapy for about 12 weeks. She lost time from work and had significant lost wages. Monetary settlement was negotiated out of court.
Rear-End Collision — Struck From Behind — Settled For $75,000
Our client, an elderly woman, was driving her car and had stopped in traffic waiting to take a turn when she was struck from behind (rear-ended) by another driver. The impact was fairly light; however, the medical evidence revealed that she had sustained a cervical whiplash injury with strain and pain in her shoulders and thoracic region or upper back. As a young woman, she had a prior accident and sustained injury to her spinal cord which left her partially paralyzed in her lower extremities. Even prior to this accident, she was totally dependent on her upper body strength for ambulation, transfers and routine activities of daily living. We argued with the liability insurer that, despite her pre-existing condition and injury, she was nevertheless independent in all activities throughout her adult life. She worked full-time outside her home and drove herself to work daily. We argued that as a result of her cervical and neck whiplash injuries and multiple strains, her overall health condition worsened. Monetary settlement was negotiated out of court.
Car Accident “Sideswiped” On Highway – Hit Guardrail – Rollover
Facts: Driver of vehicle crossed line on highway striking client’s vehicle causing it to hit guardrail, concrete wall and rollover on driver’s side.
Case name: Client versus negligent driver
Injuries alleged: Minor concussion, soft tissue strains (neck/back), fractured left long finger with partial traumatic amputation of the tip of the finger (nondependent hand).
Special damages: $21,680 (medical) no lost wages (Employer accommodated disability by temporarily providing alternate duties)
Amount of settlement: $200,000
$100,000 (policy limits) obtained from liable party automobile insurance policy. In addition to recovery from the liable party, we obtained additional settlement funds in the amount of $10,000 (policy limits) from the optional underinsurance (UM) coverage of our client’s personal automobile insurance policy. Settlement of both claims was negotiated out of court.
Our client, a 29-year-old professional woman who works in a high profile public job, was traveling on a multilane highway at normal speed when a passing vehicle crossed the line forcing her off the road into a guardrail and concrete barrier causing the vehicle to rollover on the driver’s side. The driver’s window was open and our client’s hand was partially outside the window as the vehicle dragged on its side. She suffered multiple injuries, the most significant being the injury to her left (nondominant) hand. She suffered a fractured finger and partial traumatic amputation to the tip of the left long finger. She underwent surgical debridement and repair of the finger, followed by a short course of occupational therapy for her hand and physical therapy for her neck strain. Her profession was heavily dependent on the use of the computer and the injury to her left hand presented significant problems and the need for retraining and adjustments. The value of this claim was based on a degree of functional loss that was determined by an independent medical examiner using the American Medical Association’s Guide to disability ratings. Permanent scarring and disfigurement were also given significant consideration in evaluating this claim.
Motor Vehicle Side-Swiped While Stopped
Facts: Driver injured while stopped to take a turn.
Case Name: Client versus automobile operator
Injuries alleged: Head injury with headaches, visual disturbances, dizziness, loss of balance, memory loss and cognitive impairment; neck strain, shoulder strain, back strain and multiple contusions.
Special damages: (medical expenses and lost wages)
Amount of settlement: $100,000 (full policy limits)
Our client was stopped in the left lane on a two-lane highway in Massachusetts with her directional on waiting to take a turn when she was struck on the left front driver’s side of the vehicle. The defendant alleged that our client was in the breakdown lane and crossed the road to take the turn. Recorded statements from our client, the passenger and the defendant proved the defendant to be at fault.
Client was brought to the emergency room by ambulance where she was diagnosed with a mild head injury and neck and back strain. A CT scan of her brain, all radiological studies and an EEG were negative. Physical therapy and trigger-point injections for her chronic headaches and neck failed. Memory loss and cognitive problems resulted in her not being able to practice her profession as a medical provider. She ultimately had a neuropsychological evaluation which confirmed her cognitive deficits as a result of the accident. She received cognitive therapy as an outpatient at a rehabilitation center as well as counseling for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). She was still treating for her injuries at the time of settlement. The claim was settled outside of court for the full policy limits.
Passenger Injured In Car Accident — Multiple Vehicle Collision — Settled For $34,500
Our client was a passenger in a motor vehicle that was “sideswiped” by another vehicle and pushed into a third vehicle. There were two other claimants with serious injuries involving fractures, hospitalization and extended rehabilitation. The available insurance policy was insufficient to compensate all of the damages suffered by each of the claimants. Our client was the least injured, having sustained a partial torn cartilage or torn meniscus that did not require hospitalization or surgery. She received three weeks of physical therapy to her injured knee and recovered shortly thereafter. All claimants received a monetary settlement proportional to their injuries. In addition to recovering from the liable party, we were successful in obtaining additional settlement funds from the underinsurance coverage of the client’s personal motor vehicle insurance policy. Monetary settlement was negotiated out of court.
Vehicle Passenger Injured By Low-Impact Collision
Front seat passenger suffers serious injuries despite low impact.
Case name: Passenger versus negligent driver
Injuries alleged: Right shoulder and neck pain, muscle spasms and tissue swelling of upper back.
Special Damages: $ 8,000 (medical expenses) and a period of lost wages.
Amount of settlement: $ 40,000
Our client was a 22-year-old woman who was the front seat passenger in a vehicle that was sideswiped by another car in Leominster, Massachusetts. Her car was struck on the passenger side where the plaintiff was seated. Although the impact did not cause significant property damage to the vehicle, the impact did cause significant injury to our client. Immediately after the motor vehicle accident, she was taken to the hospital in an ambulance. Her complaints were of pain in the upper thoracic and cervical areas. Tests revealed the plaintiff had limited range of motion of the neck at all angles with spasms of the right shoulder and tissue swelling of the upper back.
She was documented as having an extensive soft tissue injury. She underwent a course of physical therapy and was ultimately evaluated by a physiatrist who noted chronic cervical and thoracic strain, muscle hypertonicity and trigger points throughout her cervical and thoracic muscles. The doctor also provided several osteopathic manipulations. Her treating doctor’s opined approximately 31 weeks of disability from her employment as a rehab aide. She was reimbursed, in addition to her settlement, for a portion of her lost wages from her PIP carrier.
This case is significant given the position of the liability insurance company. It argued that a low-impact collision could not have caused our client’s extensive injuries. Our office cited medical opinions, research and studies to demonstrate how low-impact collisions have caused and can cause serious personal injuries.
“T-Boned” By Vehicle That Failed To Stop At Stop Sign
Facts: Driver was injured when car went through stop sign and T-boned driver’s side of vehicle.
Case name: Plaintiff driver versus defendant operator
Injuries alleged: Partial rotator cuff tear left shoulder, whiplash injury
Special damages: Medical expenses and lost wages
Amount of settlement: $50,000 (policy limits). No umbrella policies available, no defendant assets identified for excess damage.
Client was traveling with the right of way when vehicle failed to stop at stop sign striking our client’s vehicle at the driver’s door. Defendant was cited for incident. Client’s body slammed into the car door and her neck thrust back and forth. She was taken by ambulance to hospital for evaluation. X-rays of her neck and shoulder revealed significant degenerative changes and evidence of diffuse osteoarthritis for which she had been treating for several years. She was initially diagnosed with cervical and shoulder strains. Her primary physician referred her to physical therapy. Symptoms in her neck improved but symptoms in her shoulder and arm worsened. She was then referred to an orthopedic specialist who ordered an MRI of her shoulder. The MRI confirmed osteoarthritis and bone spurs (pre-existing) as well as a partial rotator cuff tear. She underwent three trigger point injections with minimal relief and ultimately underwent arthroscopic surgery for her shoulder followed by several months of post -operative therapy. The insurance company presented arguments regarding her extensive pre-existing medical problems as contributing factors. Nevertheless, the claim settled out of court for the insured’s policy limits of $50,000.
Motor Vehicle Accident – Head On Collision
Facts: Defendant failed to yield right of way at intersection causing head-on collision
Case name: Plaintiff Operator versus defendant operator
Injuries alleged: Cervical fracture, multiple contusions, abrasions and soft tissue injuries.
Special damages: $120,000 (medical) $6,000 (lost wages)
Amount of settlement: $100,000 (Policy Limits)
Our client was traveling with the right of way approaching an intersection when the operator of the other vehicle failed to stop at signal causing a head-on collision. Client’s vehicle was a total loss. Our client sustained multiple injuries, including a nondisplaced cervical fracture, multiple contusions, abrasions and soft tissue injuries. He was transported from the scene to a medical center via ambulance, admitted to ICU for five days, transferred to a rehabilitation hospital for eight days and ultimately discharged to home with a cervical collar and physical limitations. He is expected to recover fully from his injuries and return to his employment.
The case settled directly with the insurance company for the policy limits ($100,000) of the insured’s motor vehicle operator who caused the collision. Further investigation revealed there were no additional policies or defendant’s assets to further cover the loss.
Highway Collision — Auto Versus Parked Car — Settled For $50,000
Our client was traveling at night on a two-lane highway when he struck a vehicle that was parked and abandoned in the right travel lane. The vehicle was parked without hazard lights turned on to alert oncoming traffic. Emergency services were called and our client was rushed to the hospital emergency room via ambulance. Our client suffered a head injury, concussion and facial cuts, bruises and lacerations that resulted in two small facial scars. The full insurance policy limits were obtained from the insurer of the abandoned car while our client also was compensated from the underinsured coverage of his own insurance policy. These claims were settled out of court.
Motorcycle Accident – Driver Ran Stop Sign
Defendant driver of vehicle failed to use caution proceeding through stop sign.
Case name: Plaintiff (motorcycle) versus defendant (operator of automobile)
Injuries alleged: Pelvic fractures (nonsurgical), concussion with loss of consciousness, multiple contusions/abrasions, road rash.
Special damages: $37,000 (medical) $10,000 (wages). All medical and wages were paid by the federal government who had a right to recover benefits paid upon settlement. A settlement with the US federal government was negotiated.
Amount of settlement: $72,500 (based on comparative negligence)
Our client was operating a motorcycle in Worcester, Massachusetts and had the right of way when the operator of a vehicle proceeded into our client’s travel path causing a collision. The defendant alleged that she came to a full stop and our client was exceeding the speed limit, a witness supported the defendant’s statement. The settlement was based on a position of “comparative negligence” on the part of our client. This case settled out of court through negotiations.
Dog Bite – Dog Attack
Facts: A man was injured by a family member’s dog while walking his own dog.
Case name: Client versus homeowner
Injuries alleged: Multiple puncture wounds, lacerations on hand, forearm and legs; emotional trauma and anxiety.
Special damages: $2,400 (medical bills); $1,096 (veterinarian bills)
Amount of settlement: $18,000
Our client, an elderly man, was bitten by an off-leash dog while walking his own dog in Gardner, Massachusetts. He was visiting family when their dog unexpectedly attacked him and his own dog. He was bitten several times on the hand and leg. His dog was also injured. He went to the emergency room where he received several stitches to his finger. He was given a tetanus shot and painkillers. Over the next several months, he returned to the doctor to complain of tingling in his fingers. He lost part of his fingernail where he was bitten by the dog. Eventually, the wounds cleared and scarring was difficult to discern from other marks on the client’s hands.
Client was extremely distraught after the dog bite attack. He sought psychotherapy or therapy sessions after episodes of anxiety, depression and sleep problems. Over the course of several months the client’s anxiety lessened and he was able to decrease his level of stress. The client’s dog was injured. In addition to the client’s medical bills, he was also compensated for the veterinarian bills incurred by his dog.
Pharmacy Error – Issued Wrong Strength Opiate (Fentanyl), Overdosed
Facts: Pharmacy issued Fentanyl (opiate) patches six times the prescribed dose.
Case name: Plaintiff versus local chain pharmacy
Injuries alleged: Serious side effects from opiate overdose, including sweating, chills, muscle aches, irritability, anxiety, appetite loss, weakness, severe drowsiness, chest pain, difficulty breathing.
Special damages: No treatment or medical expenses related to incident other than adjustments to medication regime and consideration for three weeks absence from senior college classes causing stress.
Amount of settlement: $75,000 based on pain and suffering
This 21-year-old senior college student who was living on campus, went to pick up her prescription for Fentanyl (opiate) for a serious gastrointestinal disease that had been progressing. The dosage of the tablet she was issued by the pharmacy was six times the strength that had been prescribed. The label on the bottle had the prescribed dosage. She took this medication for 30 days before the error was discovered. She experienced serious life-threatening side effects that her providers could not account for other than a very strong viral infection or asthma. As symptoms progressed and diagnostic studies failed to identify the problem, her physician contacted the pharmacy to confirm her Fentanyl dosage and the error was discovered. She was sent home from school for three weeks withdrawal under the supervision of her physician and a family member who is a nurse. This claim settled out of court, the value was based on pain and suffering.
Pharmacy Error – Filled RX With Wrong Strength Tablet/ Labeled Incorrectly
Facts: Pharmacy issued steroid tablets double the strength prescribed – wrong info on label.
Case name: Plaintiff versus national chain pharmacy
Injuries alleged: Disabling side effects from steroid overdose: facial swelling, mood changes, progressive weakness, weight gain, visual disturbances, unsteady gait, insomnia, poor endurance, tremors, anxiety.
Special damages: Lost wages
Amount of settlement: $60,000
Our client, a 50-year-old union laborer, was discharged from the hospital with a prescription for a steroid medication that had been prescribed for an inflammatory neurological condition. The prescription was for 10 mg tablets and he would be taking this in titrating doses over the course of nine weeks. The label on the bottle indicated 10 mg tablets, but the pharmacist filled the prescription with 20 mg tablets instead of 10 mg tablets. He was taking double the dose of the prescribed steroid. He developed serious disabling side effects as the result of his steroid overdose, including extreme facial swelling, weight gain, visual disturbances, tremors, insomnia, anxiety, hypertension, to name a few. He had several follow up visits for his neurological disorder and it was acknowledged that he was having some side effects from the steroid use. Adjustments in his dosage and schedule were made, however, he was not responding to the adjustments because he continued to take the pills he had initially been given. Neither he nor his physicians knew he was taking double doses of whatever dosage they prescribed and continued to do so until the prescription was refilled with the correct strength tablet (10mg) when he noted the difference in color and shape. His recovery and withdrawal from the overdose was scheduled over the course of several weeks as this medication could not be abruptly withdrawn. He returned to work three weeks after completing steroid therapy. The side effects from his steroid overdose were well documented by his physicians who also documented that these side effects were extremely disabling.
Pharmacy Error — Chain Fills Wrong Prescription — Settled For $40,000
Our client was given a written prescription for high blood pressure by his primary care doctor. He presented the written prescription to a local branch of a national pharmacy chain. Unfortunately, the script was incorrectly filled with another medication that had similar spelling. The pharmacy continued to incorrectly refill this prescription over the course of the next five months. The error was eventually discovered by the treating physician when he called the pharmacy to renew the prescription. Our client’s blood pressure fortunately was not affected; however, he experienced side effects from the wrong medication that were interpreted as symptoms of unrelated illnesses and disease. As a result, he experienced significant distress and consequently underwent several unnecessary expensive and invasive diagnostic studies. Additionally, he went without treatment for his high blood pressure that put him at a significant health risk. Monetary settlement was negotiated out of court.
Supermarket Negligence – Broken Glass
Facts: Client shopping and picked up a broken/shattered glass jar causing injury.
Case name: Plaintiff versus local chain supermarket
Injuries alleged: Deep laceration to the base of index finger and palm of hand with nerve damage.
Special damages: Medical expenses, lost income, loss or earning capacity
Amount of settlement: $124,000
Our client, a 50-year-old health professional, was shopping in a large chain supermarket. She reached for and picked up a jar of pickles displayed on the shelf. The jar was wet and slippery and began slipping from her hand. She reached with her other hand to grab the bottom of the jar, but the bottom was broken and shattered. She sustained a deep laceration to her index finger and palm of her hand. The wound was cleansed and sutured in the emergency room. The wound healed, but she developed sharp constant pain. She consulted a hand surgeon and underwent a myriad of diagnostic studies that confirmed the presence of a foreign body (glass), scar tissue and digital nerve damage. Surgical intervention was too risky for further damage. She underwent a course of occupational therapy without improvement and pain management became her only option.
She attempted to return to her profession that required the use of both hands, manual dexterity, strength and fine motor skills, but her neurological symptoms were greatly exacerbated and she ultimately had to give up her profession. The medical records supported a claim for a “permanent partial disability”. The challenge with this claim was to prove that management was aware or should have been aware of the condition of the displays and “neglected” to correct the problem. Liability was initially denied and suit was filed. The case settled outside of court shortly thereafter. The monetary value was based on the severity of the injury, the extensive loss of income and the supporting medical documentation.
Supermarket – Wet Floor
Case name: Client versus local supermarket
Injuries alleged: Torn rotator cuff, lower back injury
Special damages: $5,408 (medical); $2,400 (lost wages)
Amount of settlement: $65,000
The plaintiff, age 76, was shopping at the defendant’s supermarket in Leominster when she reportedly slipped and fell on an accumulation of water on the floor. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent to timely remove the water or provide adequate warning of the accumulation. The defendant contested the length of time the water was on the floor and whether the defendant had notice thereof.
On the date of the accident, the plaintiff went to the emergency room at Leominster hospital with complaints of left wrist, shoulder and lower back pain. The emergency room staff diagnosed her as having a wrist and shoulder sprain.
She elected treatment with a local chiropractor, who referred her to an orthopedic surgeon for evaluation. The chiropractor resolved neck and back injuries.
The plaintiff followed up with an orthopedic surgeon who confirmed a torn rotator cuff (right shoulder) via an MRI and bone scan. Arthroscopic debridement of the rotator cuff tear as well as AC joint excision was recommended.
The plaintiff elected, primarily due to her age, not to proceed with surgery.
The plaintiff provided the insurer with projected future medical expenses (surgical) and detailed information relative to the plaintiff’s likely postoperative recovery period, which was anticipated to be lengthy.
Stairway-Noncompliance With State Building Code
Case name: Guest versus property owner
Injuries alleged: Left wrist and pelvic fractures
Special damages: $79,905 (medical)
Amount of settlement: $125,000
The plaintiff, a 74-year-old woman, slipped and fell on the front steps of the building where she was a tenant. The defendant was her landlord. The plaintiff alleged that the stairway was not in compliance with the local building code, nor equipped with required handrails. The defendant insurer contested liability citing the defendant’s property was exempt from building code requirements because of “grandfather” status. After the fall, the plaintiff was transported to the emergency room via ambulance. She was admitted as an inpatient and required surgery for a complex fracture of her left arm; she also had to wear a back brace for a fractured pelvis. The plaintiff was released and transferred to a skilled nursery facility where she remained. She received physical and outpatient therapy.
The plaintiff’s treatment was interrupted as she was admitted to the hospital for an unrelated medical condition. Upon her release, she was readmitted to a skilled nursing facility. A further surgery on her arm occurred in which a bone graft was required. The plaintiff remained in the hospital. She was readmitted to a skilled nursing facility. When the plaintiff was discharged to her home, she received in-home care.
The case settled due to the serious nature of the plaintiff’s injuries. The plaintiff passed away several months after the settlement from unrelated causes.
Horseplay — Injuries To Minor Child
Case name: Parent of child versus homeowner
Injuries alleged: Multiple fractures of left arm with resultant scarring
Special damages: $13,321 (medical)
Amount of settlement: $142,067 (including structured payout for minor)
The plaintiff and her minor child, then age 5, were visiting the home of the defendant in Leominster. At some point during the visit, the plaintiff left the room where her child was playing with the defendant, to use the phone.
A loud noise alerted the plaintiff where her child had been playing. The plaintiff returned to see her child on the floor suffering convulsions as a result of the fall. The defendant, also an adult, had been playing with the child, had allegedly thrown the child into the air and had failed to catch the child before he hit the ground. Upon impact with the ground, the child suffered multiple fractures of the left arm.
The child was taken to the hospital where he stayed for two days. A splint was inserted through a surgical procedure. Approximately a year-and-a-half after the surgery, the child developed complications from the plate attached to his bone. He underwent a second procedure to remove the plate.
During recovery, he developed an infection at the site. He was treated with various antibiotics and injections. Post surgery and recovery, the child exhibited a scar on this arm. The minor child was evaluated by a plastic surgeon who opined that the scarring was likely permanent. The minor plaintiff initiated suit in the Worcester Superior Court on various theories of negligence. The adult plaintiff mother filed a loss of consortium claim.
The case settled shortly after suit was filed. A petition of approval of minor’s settlement was heard and allowed by the court.
Snow And Ice On Parking Lot
Case name: Plaintiff versus local warehouse chain store
Injuries alleged: Partial rotator cuff of left shoulder
Special damages: $14,000(medical expenses)
Amount of settlement: $40,000
The plaintiff, a 69-year-old man, was at the defendant’s parking lot in Leominster. Several steps from his vehicle, the plaintiff fell and injured himself on the slippery surface. The defendants’ insurer, the store and plowing service argued that the plaintiff slipped and fell on a natural accumulation of snow and ice; hence, no liability attached.
The plaintiff successfully argued that the snow or ice that created the hazard — upon which the plaintiff fell — was no longer in its natural state. In fact, tire marks and rust allegedly had frozen underneath a natural accumulation of snow and ice, which had covered the tire ruts.
The plowing company and the defendant’s insurer eventually settled on this point.
The plaintiff first presented himself at the Leominster hospital emergency room two days post injury. He was diagnosed with a shoulder sprain and treated conservatively with his primary care physician and prescribed physical therapy. He received corticosteroid injections from a rheumatologist.
Approximately one year later, he was diagnosed with a partial rotator cuff tear. Some six months later, his orthopedist performed arthroscopy on his should to repair the partial rotator cuff tear. The plaintiff continued with therapy and steroid injections.
Choose An Attorney Who Will Fight For What You Need
Choosing the right attorney is not easy. We hope you will call us to find out why so many people have come to us for help. At Roncone Law Offices, P.C. we are known for putting our clients first. We care about our clients and work closely with them to make sure their rights are protected.
To learn more about the kind of representation that the lawyers at Roncone Law Offices, P.C., can provide you, contact us at (978) 534-2444. Our Leominster, Massachusetts, office also serves the Fitchburg and Worcester areas.